Over 59558

Gun Politics

Tim McGraw: Obama-Lovin', Anti-Gun Liberal Douche -

TAGS: tim mcgraw liberal douche gun grabber faith hill democrats progressives country music obama supporter
Rating: 4.84/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

nicholsjoshua15 - July 8, 2015, 9:52 pm
Tim MccGraw putting the **** in Country.

SWITZERLAND - 4th in the world in guns per capita,extremely permissive gun control laws, and a LOW crime rate. Hmmm...

TAGS: guns capita usa control
Rating: 4.72/5

More politifakes by thatmfguy

americamessedup - November 22, 2014, 11:13 pm
Maybe it's because they don't pump fear through media
nicholsjoshua15 - March 3, 2013, 10:45 pm
Just try to ra** these two lovely ladies and they'll be digging 556 lead out of your cold dead a*s at a morgue.

THE EXPERTS AGREE - gun control works

TAGS: gun control hitler castro qaddafi stalin idi amin mao tse tung pol pot kim jong il
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by DLM4

ipaprime - September 7, 2012, 9:57 pm
you eed to remove Qaddafi from the line up cause it didnt work for him

GUN NUT LOGIC - Yeah, that's about the size of it.

TAGS: gun nuts
Rating: 2.12/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Pikeman - November 4, 2015, 7:35 pm
The idiots that panic at the sight of a gun call the police (people they often call deranged killers) who bring more guns to the scene.
Pikeman - November 4, 2015, 7:33 pm
People carrying guns concealed and/or openly don't stop mass murders because they stop the murderer before he has achieved the necessary body count to be called a mass murderer.
realitycheck - October 27, 2015, 5:37 pm
comic is a lie from beginning to end. Everywhere the 2nd amendment is enforced, ALL crime has gone down-- and every last crazy killer was stopped by someone else with a gun. Often, a citizen.
PapaFox - February 18, 2013, 10:12 am
Nah, I'm not artistic. Found it out there in cyberspace.
Renza - February 18, 2013, 10:04 am
rofl, did you make this yourself, or did you find it somewhere? regardless it is awesome.

LIBERALS - following Hitler's lead

TAGS: gun control hitler liberals
Rating: 4.03/5

More politifakes by DLM4

wdstk6969 - January 26, 2014, 11:36 pm
I am trying to find where this quote came from originally. I've been told it's not a real Hitler quote and I'd like to prove the Kool-Aid drinker wrong. thanks

GUNS KILL PEOPLE - like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.

TAGS: guns
Rating: 4.68/5

More politifakes by vbattaile

Comedian1298 - December 8, 2012, 11:28 pm
and the oval office makes obama a moron
Comedian1298 - November 24, 2012, 12:58 am
Technically, bullets do kill people more than the guns they are fired from. Unless the person dies from being hit over the side of their head with a gun.
crankyhead - October 4, 2012, 5:44 pm
I think we can all agree that some people use guns to kill other people. Right?
OTC - October 4, 2012, 5:39 pm
I saw a libtard documentary on guns and the idiot host stated "guns don't kill people, bullets do."

Gun Facts -

VEHICLES - Kill people!

Obama's responsible gun control -

TAGS: obama gun control
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by 11BangBang

Bandit5906 - January 9, 2016, 3:36 pm
The destruction of America: Obama's goal!

THE PERFECT BORDER PATROL! - Just try to jump this fence! No Border, No Order, No Nation. Which part of ILLEGAL do you not understand?


TAGS: guncontrol obama dictators
Rating: 4.68/5

More politifakes by mij9179

Scramblus - November 11, 2013, 8:26 am
oddly enough nazi germany actually relazed gun control laws ( a**uming you wernt jewish).

NOT THE ANSWER - Only Criminals Would Have Guns Then..

A RARE LOOK - At the North Korean Air Force

TAGS: north korean kimjongun
Rating: 4.56/5

More politifakes by thatmfguy

crankyhead - April 10, 2013, 3:15 pm

GUN CONTROL - The theory that a woman found dead in an ally, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to the police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound

TAGS: gun control
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by DLM4

antigun -

TAGS: antigun
Rating: 4.68/5

More politifakes by JGalt

Renza - May 3, 2013, 8:42 am
Side note, I like how only the first two S in a**assination are blocked. whats ^ with that
Renza - May 3, 2013, 8:41 am
Can't say I know a whole lot about JFK other than his a**assination is tied to conspiracy theories. the modern extreme > and < today though are nuts, they use O logic to justify the bills they > that really just bring v this country.
JGalt - May 3, 2013, 8:27 am
If u compare a < from 1960 like JFK, he would be labelled extreme > today, which goes to show that the < has gone way to far to the
Renza - May 3, 2013, 8:24 am
decisions shouldn't be < ^ to the crazies, they will always let us v, which the > often seem to be.
JGalt - May 3, 2013, 8:18 am
left, that is
Renza - May 3, 2013, 7:36 am
>wingers tend to be crazy
Renza - May 3, 2013, 7:35 am
^it's true because its fun
JGalt - May 3, 2013, 12:24 am
^^OTC is right
Renza - May 2, 2013, 6:07 pm
OTC - May 2, 2013, 4:19 pm
And renza's comment comes right after "Liberals fail at logic", right on cue.
Renza - May 2, 2013, 7:50 am
This is why conservatives typically respond with random topic-changing gibberish based in fiction?
JGalt - May 1, 2013, 11:14 pm
Liberals fail at logic, they are driven by hate and emotion so your point is moot
Renza - May 1, 2013, 8:04 am
The irony of that statement is impressive - Stating that another group is misunderstanding the argument that you have put forth based on misunderstanding their argument... is that win or fail?
JGalt - May 1, 2013, 12:30 am
Liberals don't understand the concept!
OTC - April 30, 2013, 8:31 pm
Immutable truth
Oyster - April 19, 2013, 10:25 am

The Insanity of Political Correctness -

MORE GUN LAWS - apparently NOT the answer

TAGS: guns
Rating: 4.83/5

More politifakes by JGalt

The NRA -

GUN CONTROL - Isn't it ironic that an amendment put in place to protect us from unjust government is trying to be controlled by the government?


Killary Klinton -


TAGS: gandhi pro gun support india hindu guns
Rating: 4.08/5

More politifakes by RepublicanClone

Curlyrocks - December 1, 2013, 12:55 pm
So you need some one to go full Zimm before you'll accept their opinion on gun freedom. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfvLcozLwtE
birddseedd - December 1, 2013, 1:23 am
His speech made it clear that he would support his neighbors using arms. It does not state if he himself would. But with his other words I suspect he would not. I have friends that support gun ownership, but would not own one themselves.
crankyhead - November 30, 2013, 8:56 pm
How many people did Gandhi go full Zimmerman on?
birddseedd - November 28, 2013, 11:20 pm
I read the full statement this came from. it IS in context


DEAR ANTI-GUN FOLKS: - Stand up for what you believe in and post this on your front door!

TAGS: gun control laws 2nd amendment
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by thatmfguy

BiteMeNow - February 22, 2014, 11:55 pm
Never happen. Their a$$hole motto is "Do as I say, not as I do.

Papal Hypocrisy -



TAGS: guncontrol
Rating: 4.44/5

More politifakes by mij9179

blesic - August 31, 2014, 9:05 pm
Uh, guns are bad. Okay.

Gun rights are for fighting tyranny -

TAGS: battaile vik guns
Rating: 4.28/5

More politifakes by vbattaile

Curlyrocks - May 13, 2013, 10:29 pm
good a***ogy.

ONE GUY IN THE CROWD - Could have saved a lot of lives last night

TAGS: gun
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by Lboy

GUN CONTROL - It's not about GUNS, It's about CONTROL ...and knowing when to pull the trigger

control -

I'LL SHOW YOU GUN CONTROL! - GUN-CONTROL! ...without it, we would miss who we were shooting at! Gun Control means using both hands

How can you with a straight face make the argument that more guns will make us safer? -

TAGS: obama guns
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by jackj

calron - December 4, 2015, 2:46 am
I've never heard of someone wielding a Walmart!
therightwrong - December 2, 2015, 8:57 am
ding dong, thry have weapons to protect themselves from all the gun packing walmart weilding idiots such as yourself!

2ND AMENDMENT - "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -Thomas Jefferson Seems clear enough to me. Why do progressives/liberals still argue this?

PARANOID GUN NUTS - They can be so entertaining.

TAGS: gun nuts
Rating: 1.86/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Pikeman - November 5, 2015, 6:24 am
Tomorrow is a different question. 0peration Fast and Furious was to justify limiting Americans access to guns by making a larger percentage of the guns confiscated in Mexico traceable to the USofA. lt was caught by people that love truth > hate gun. LUCKY
RonaldReagan - June 4, 2015, 7:19 pm

CHICAGO - Very strict gun control laws, very high crime rate.

Obama's Selective Outrage -

GUN CONTROL MEANS USING BOTH HANDS - GUN CONTROL: Firm Grip, Focused Sight, Steady Aim. Support Gun Control. Use Both Hands and Know Where You're Shooting.

TAGS: guns
Rating: 4.18/5

More politifakes by vbattaile


Hildabeast Rotten Klinton -

TAGS: hillary clinton 2016 gun grabbing hypocrisy benghazi libya killary klinton hildabeast hypocrisy what difference does it make
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Libertas - October 9, 2015, 3:58 pm
too bad I can only give this 5 lions. This explains liberals to a "T". Compartmentalize... trivialize and projection.... "The truth is what we say it is!!"

SENSIBLE PEOPLE - Aren’t intimidated by industry lobbyists.

TAGS: gun control
Rating: 1.87/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

calron - January 10, 2016, 6:10 pm
Adding the word "assault" before a word may make it seem all scary, but if you it in unimpressive in this case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle#Assault_rifles_vs._assault_weapons
Pikeman - November 5, 2015, 7:37 am
Fools willing to give up rights against people fighting for their rights; leftists call the first group sensible. People that keep and bear arms protect your privilege of disagreeing with the government.
Jamison12 - May 4, 2014, 11:23 pm
Although I am Liberal, I am not entirely opposed to guns, but the NRA is just the WBC of gun activists in my opinion
BALLS - February 11, 2013, 10:43 pm
And we all know how pissed you libtards get every time a business makes a profit... except for those that donate copius ammounts of money to the Democrat party and their candidates.
PapaFox - January 24, 2013, 9:29 pm
It's not a "pro 2nd Amendment" movement. It's a "get suckered into supporting the gun industry's profits" movement.
bgdog - January 24, 2013, 8:50 pm
Yep, they're so responsible that they're no having to cancel the event. That said, it's not just the NRA, it's the entire pro 2nd Amendment movement.

NUMBERS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES - Now it depends on whether Washington will listen.

TAGS: gun nuts
Rating: 1.84/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Doggit - January 25, 2013, 10:04 am
Yeah the bad guy that would be unaffected by gun control laws.
PapaFox - January 24, 2013, 9:29 pm
Someone did.
Doggit - January 24, 2013, 7:25 pm
And don't you wish someone at Sandy Hook or the aurora theater had a gun.
Doggit - January 24, 2013, 9:27 am
Emotionally theses numbers scream for action. Statistically these numbers are insignificant.
foxrecon19d - January 24, 2013, 9:11 am
Woof... look at that. The highest years were when Democrats were in power and pushing their gun-control legislation. The numbers DO speak for themselves


CELEBRITY IDIOT - When discussing the right to bear arms, Rosie O'Donnell stated: "It's not really a right." Somebody duct tape her mouth shut, please.

TAGS: liberal anti gun ignorant rosie o donnell
Rating: 4.13/5

More politifakes by WTFO

Thedewd - July 27, 2017, 12:40 pm
The tray of ice cubes in my freezer has a higher IQ than this cow.

GUN LAWS - Yeah keep making them cause they're just working out GREAT

TAGS: gun
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by Lboy

LIBERTARIAN LOGIC - Don't ban guns, just legalize weed and violent crime will become a thing of the past

TAGS: weed guns ban pineapple
Rating: 2.7/5

More politifakes by Curlyrocks

RonaldReagan - March 23, 2015, 3:00 pm
Teenager logic too. 5stars
fauxnews - February 27, 2014, 7:34 pm
W-eed + guns = a good time! Don't knock it to you try it........mannnnnn. X-D (Don't agree w/the poster, but I still give this 5stars anyways, if for nothing else, it has picture from Pineapple Express in it. I mean, come on!) X-D LOL
Curlyrocks - March 31, 2013, 3:38 pm
Because that America would be too awesome and no one would feel depressed or insecure for any reason (aside from people who get paranoid when they smoke), basically there system would fall apart.
Rudedog - March 30, 2013, 8:22 pm
The only good thing about Libertarians is that there is no hidden agenda, it is all written in the constitution.
Cannabal - March 30, 2013, 4:44 pm
The only good thing about Libertarians is that they want everyone to have guns and weed. Why can't we live in THAT America?
Renza - March 30, 2013, 4:30 pm
...aside from 'political bs' I fail to see why anyone would want to keep it illegal. taxing and selling it could allow for a boost in the economy, fewer arrests and subsequent trials, more (legal) jobs, plus medical benefits and further research of them.
Renza - March 30, 2013, 4:29 pm
but look at all the cases of people getting high on marajuana and going on murderous rampages, and causing bar fights, and high speed fatal accidents...
Doggit - March 30, 2013, 10:26 am
Sure would end the war on drugs


TAGS: christ jesus lord christian pro gun support cross christianity sword
Rating: 3.04/5

More politifakes by RepublicanClone

GrouchoMarxists - November 17, 2017, 8:58 pm
And liberals probably think they had guns back in Roman times. Morons...

SINGLE SHOT WEAPON - Doesn't mean safer than fully automatic weapon.


ASSAULT RIFLES - The semi-auto civilian model of the AR-15 is NOT one.


Hypocrisy -


VIDEO GAMES - You can have my joystick when you pry it from my cold dead hands!

TAGS: video games gun control violence
Rating: 3.77/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - August 1, 2015, 9:13 pm
F'uckin' A, I know the gov'ment ain't gettin' my BFG. They can have a few rounds of it though.
RonaldReagan - July 19, 2015, 2:16 am
Still can't have my guns

GUN NUT LOGIC - Taken to its "logical" conclusion...

TAGS: gun nuts
Rating: 2.25/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

ipaprime - February 22, 2013, 7:42 am
if they got one i want one to protect myself
PapaFox - February 21, 2013, 11:26 am
Hoping for neighborhood nuclear superiority over those annoying people across the street?
ipaprime - February 21, 2013, 9:41 am
hey if the gov gets em so do we. BECAUSE WE ARE THE GOVERMENT!


LIBERAL LOGIC - Sarah Palin gets blamed for Gabby Giffords attempted murder. Obama and Holder paid for the weapons that killed Agent Terry Can you hear the Crickets?

CHICAGO 1982 HANDGUN BAN - Unconstitutional, Unsafe. Gun Rights Keep Citizens Safe.

CURIOUS - Silence

TAGS: gun control trayvon martin
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

crankyhead - July 19, 2013, 2:58 pm
*Doing my best impression of Ben Stein in Ferris Bueller's Day Off.* JGalt.....? JGalt.....? JGalt......?
terroraustralis - July 18, 2013, 10:30 am
ironically enough, if his school had reported him, then he would have been in jail awaiting trial the night he died. if it wasnt for his school covering up his crimes, trayvon would be alive.
terroraustralis - July 18, 2013, 10:29 am
i am not sure if his criminal record at the time would have prohibited him from owning a gun, but his school apparently failed to report him for committing a crime, dealing with the issue internally so he wouldnt be arrested
KATO - July 18, 2013, 2:40 am
Would it make a difference if Trayvon registered a gun legally or just stolen one?
terroraustralis - February 8, 2013, 6:06 pm
and if someone attacks you and threatens your life, you should have every right to defend yourself by whatever means you deem neccesary, regardless of what skin colour the attacker has.
terroraustralis - February 8, 2013, 6:05 pm
because trayvon martin was the exact kind of CRIMINAL a**HOLE whom gun control legislation is designed to prevent from owning a gun. just because he was black and unarmed doesnt mean he didnt a**AULT george zimmerman.
BALLS - February 8, 2013, 2:41 pm
Sure he did. Keep drinking that koolaid.
PapaFox - February 8, 2013, 2:39 pm
George Zimmerman hunted down a unarmed scary black teenager
BALLS - February 8, 2013, 1:18 pm
Treyvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman. If anything, Zimmerman needed the gun.

IF THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOESN'T WORK, - the Second Amendment will. The 2nd Amendment Protects the 1st Amendment

Liberal Moonbats -

TAGS: liberal moonbats progressives democrats gun grabbers nra second amendment 2a assault weapons hippies hillary clinton bernie sanders supporters
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

freasy - November 3, 2015, 11:52 am
The guy posted it as a joke to see who would bite. He got blasted from the Right, and even had lefties agreeing with and applauding him LMAO
tommygun - October 14, 2015, 9:43 pm
That's hilarious! Stupid people are so entertaining


TAGS: gun control
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by SRD


LIBERAL MYTH ON GUNS - "Accidents with firearms kill kids, so we must have gun control laws" Then we better ban water also (almost 8 times as deadly as guns) Cars too (36+ times more deadly)


TAGS: gun
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

CONSERVATIVE WOMEN - Exercising 2nd Amendment Rights at their monthly NRA Ladies Auxiliary meeting. (Women + Guns = Sexy)


THE SECOND AMENDMENT - It's For Tyrants, Stupid! An Armed Public Deters Tyranny



GUNS AND WEED - Maybe if government wasn't allowed to go after either of these, they wouldn't be going after both of them now.

Obama's Gun Plan -

Hillary's Hellacious Hypocrisy -

Inconsistency -

TAGS: guns cars rights republican politics
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by blesic

blesic - September 26, 2014, 12:04 pm
Thank you.
foxrecon19d - September 26, 2014, 6:11 am
No. I think that comment is the best one on this site.
blesic - September 26, 2014, 12:09 am
No. I think my poster is the best one on this site.
OTC - September 25, 2014, 5:44 pm
oh ok, suppose you educate us on that
JunRed - September 25, 2014, 3:39 pm
not really. besides, I was just mocking an utterly retarded comment about a "right to eat" as an idiotic retort to gun-control. the founding fathers never intended the 2nd amendment to be an individual right or for you to carry homicidal a**ault weapons
Curlyrocks - September 25, 2014, 2:19 pm
It's part of the whole "right to life" thing in the constitution.
OTC - September 25, 2014, 12:57 pm
So you're arguing your own poster?
blesic - September 25, 2014, 12:25 am
That part was eaten by accident.
JunRed - September 24, 2014, 12:04 pm
I don't remember the Right to Eat amendment.
JunRed - September 24, 2014, 12:03 pm
blesic - September 24, 2014, 11:50 am
In that case you should understand my poster since it says in 2 lines what you said in 10.
EmmaRoydes - September 24, 2014, 2:37 am
gun ownership is a right, not a privilege as stated in the 2nd amendment "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms..."
EmmaRoydes - September 24, 2014, 2:31 am
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that driving an automobile was not a right, but a privilege. States can take away a person's privilege to drive if that person doesn't conform to that state's code of safe conduct.
EmmaRoydes - September 24, 2014, 2:24 am
protect Rights.
EmmaRoydes - September 24, 2014, 2:24 am
You do not have to ask to exercise a Right. You do have to ask to exercise a privilege. You have a Right to eat. You do not have a Right to eat my food. You have to barter (free market) or I can give it to you (charity) The purpose of government is to
blesic - September 24, 2014, 12:22 am
Yes it does.
OTC - September 23, 2014, 6:09 pm
You can buy a TV take it home and use it with no obligations, doesn't mean it's a right to own one
blesic - September 23, 2014, 12:18 am
Curlyrocks - September 22, 2014, 2:08 pm
Maybe guns and cars should be treated the same, You can buy a car or a gun, take it to your home and do what you want with it on your own property. But society has to test your competence before you take it out in public where people could get hurt.
blesic - September 20, 2014, 7:38 pm
In that case no one has the right to own a gun. It is only a privilege granted by the government.
Cyberhagen - September 20, 2014, 6:34 pm
Getting a drivers license does not require a background check and a witness or reference. Buying a gun permit does.
Cyberhagen - September 20, 2014, 6:33 pm
By that logic then, buying a gun is a privilege, not a right, because you can't just buy a gun and take it home with no other obligations or prerequisites. The point is, BOTH getting a license to drive and a license to buy a gun requires a process.
blesic - September 20, 2014, 1:07 pm
A driver's license and registration. In most states you don't need a license or registration to own a gun. All that is required is a record of the purchase.
EmmaRoydes - September 20, 2014, 12:57 pm
What permission are you referring to that doesn't equally apply to a gun?
blesic - September 20, 2014, 12:54 pm
The point is one can buy a gun, take it home, and use it. One can buy a car, take it home, but not use it without permission.
EmmaRoydes - September 20, 2014, 12:45 pm
the key word in your statement is "legally". You can do almost anything if you disregard legality. You can commit murder, but not legally. So, I don't understand your point.
blesic - September 20, 2014, 12:41 pm
You are wrong. Getting a license to drive a car is a privilege not a right. Buying a car and driving it home with no other obligations demonstrates a right.
blesic - September 20, 2014, 12:36 pm
There are no amendments about cars. One can own a car but cannot drive it legally without a license and registration.
Cyberhagen - September 20, 2014, 12:27 pm
Flawed logic. You only need take a test to get a drivers license, and even that is easily circumvented these days. You need to apply and undergo an investigation to get a gun permit; and even more so for a handgun; at least, in my state.
EmmaRoydes - September 20, 2014, 12:24 pm
The second amendment covers gun ownership. I don't recall any amendments that cover car ownership (or driving one for that matter)



TAGS: rip marines chattanooga tennessee islamic terrorism mass shooting gun free zone usmc skip wells carson holmquist david wyatt thomas sullivan semper fidelis mohammad youssuf abdulazeez
Rating: 4.93/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Bandit5906 - July 20, 2015, 2:01 pm
Pardon the typo: out = our
Bandit5906 - July 20, 2015, 2:00 pm
The only places that are attacked are gun-free zone and our leaders refuse to allow our military to have guns to defend themselves. Leaders claim an "innocent" could get injured? Out military die?


GUN CONTROL - Is great, because without it Cenk Uygur's Turkish ancestors couldn't have carried out the Armenian Genocide!


PROHIBTION - Conservatives and liberals are wrong. Libertarians are right!



GUN CONTROL - Is The Gipper a tyrant for supporting very conservative legislation regulating the sales of firearms?

TAGS: gun control ronald reagan conservative
Rating: 3.4/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - January 18, 2013, 10:03 am
Worse: they'd call Reagan a LIBRUL!
PapaFox - January 18, 2013, 9:32 am
Today they'd call him a RINO. :(

If a military base with hundreds of soldiers armed with hundreds of guns couldn't stop 'this guy', an American Terrorist armed with ONE gun... -

TAGS: gun control hasan more guns
Rating: 3.21/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - January 22, 2014, 12:52 pm
TRANSLATION(OTC/Arnnatz's sock): I hate when he does the translation thing... really pushes my b***ons.
OTC - January 22, 2014, 12:17 pm
This is similar to cranky's poster which had a long discussion about it. Obviously, someone wasn't paying attention, probably too busy bathering about translations
fauxnews - January 21, 2014, 11:44 pm
Four posts?!?!?!? This one he responds to himself. Does that mean his anger cracked him in half, like an online version of Gollum, and he argues with himself?!?!?!? HULK SMASH!!! GRRRRRR...PUNY LIBERAL!!! RAAAAWWWRRR!!! >X-D
fauxnews - January 21, 2014, 11:42 pm
Wow, now THREE separate posts. All in under a minute! Watch out....he's REALLY MAD NOW... haha.. Can't wait to see what you do for an encore? Let me guess, it has something to do with.....angry?
fauxnews - January 21, 2014, 11:41 pm
Wow, not one but two posts. Did I push a b***on, mate? :-) Why not just save yourself the trouble and just write "Angry, Angry, blah, blah, Angry!" Never have I seen someone waste so many words to express so small an idea, or so simple a base emotion.
JGalt - January 21, 2014, 11:41 pm
FauxPoster, thanks for trying to mislead, as usual...
JGalt - January 21, 2014, 11:40 pm
for commanders to issue firearms to soldiers in the U.S. for personal protection. For the most part, only military police regularly carry firearms on base, and their presence is stretched thin by high demand for MPs in war zones
JGalt - January 21, 2014, 11:39 pm
Among President Clinton’s first acts upon taking office in 1993 was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases. In March 1993, the Army imposed regulations forbidding military personnel from carrying their personal firearms and making it almost impossible
JGalt - January 21, 2014, 11:38 pm
you really are kinda special thinking that they let soldiers have gun outside of combat. You might want to check on that... MP's might actually be the only ones with weapons. Thanks for playing

THE 2ND AMENDMENT - Is not in danger, now get a grip.

Second Amendment -

TAGS: guns jesus violence republican conservative
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by blesic

blesic - September 21, 2014, 9:42 pm
Concisely put.
Bandit5906 - September 21, 2014, 9:02 pm
Of course! What good would a gun be (for defense) if he could not use it responsibly?

BAD-ADD FANTASIES - Not a good source of militia material.

TAGS: gun nuts
Rating: 2.23/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Rudedog - January 22, 2013, 12:38 am
You talk of straw man fallacy?


TOUCHSTONES OF TYRANNY - "To disarm the people [is] the best and most effectual way to enslave them." - George Mason


THE 2ND AMENDMENT - isn't for hunting.

PROJECT GUNRUNNER - When WILL MSM decide to start investigating just one Obama Administration scandal-??? 2012, end of the error.


ANN COULTER - Ready for give liberal commentators a piece of something more deadly than her mind.

ERIC HOLDER - You want my guns? Sure, come get them. I'll give 'em to ya one bullet at a time.

GUN NUT LOGIC - Yeah, it's that bad.

TAGS: gun nuts
Rating: 2.5/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - April 2, 2013, 4:39 pm
Revenge against past offenses, real or imagined.
Renza - April 2, 2013, 4:15 pm
my guess is either religious or crazy... guess that's a bit redundant of an answer though.
crankyhead - April 2, 2013, 3:11 pm
IPA, what if the 'terrorist' in question, in his own heart, isn't fighting for freedom? Then what is he?
ipaprime - April 2, 2013, 9:04 am
one persons terrorist is anothers freedom fighter. it would be for history to decide
Renza - April 2, 2013, 8:34 am
So, you think they'd just be well organized terrorists and guerrilla forces?
ipaprime - April 2, 2013, 8:17 am
no I am saying they would be an irregular force which history has shown regular military has problems dealing with
ipaprime - April 2, 2013, 8:15 am
there are people out there who have most likely planned out how to neutralize tanks efficiently with avalible resouces
Renza - April 1, 2013, 11:15 am
So you're basically saying that if there was a civil war, the rebels would ultimately be reduced down to little more than terrorists and guerrilla militias?
PapaFox - April 1, 2013, 10:56 am
Again, the basic premise being that the dweeb who thinks he's going to take on the government just because he owns an a**ault rifle and some Walmart cammo is living in a fantasy world.
ipaprime - April 1, 2013, 10:13 am
if you want to see a good depiction of how a tank fares against an irregular force try and find a movie called "The BEAST" it is set in afganastan during its Russian occupation
ipaprime - April 1, 2013, 10:08 am
or look at how the germans fared in occupided Europe during WW2
ipaprime - April 1, 2013, 10:06 am
talk to the soilders in Iraq and afghanastan about how useful tanks are fighting an irregular force, or for that matter look at the Vietnam conflict
Renza - April 1, 2013, 9:55 am
the historical a***ysis of a hypothetical future unclarified/unspecified event that would involve technology that did not previously exist? I don't think that has any effect on relatively small bullets vs heavy armor plating.
ipaprime - April 1, 2013, 9:31 am
but the historical anaylisis does invalidate the premise behind the poster
Renza - April 1, 2013, 8:37 am
the hypothetical scenario of the rebel forces being crushed in no way impacts the premise of the poster.
ipaprime - April 1, 2013, 8:02 am
as I acknowledged in #50867
crankyhead - March 31, 2013, 1:57 pm
If this is too much work for you, you can always take your ball and go home. Again.
crankyhead - March 31, 2013, 1:57 pm
So if I was you, and thank fk I'm not, I would take care at which accusations I'm capable of dealing out to others, and which accusations are better suited for examining the falsehoods inherent in your own beliefs, or lack thereof.
crankyhead - March 31, 2013, 1:54 pm
The only miracle IPA, is your ability to still not believe in fossils, when literally millions of them exist, and are available to see and study, around the world.
Renza - March 31, 2013, 1:52 pm
the premise that an a**ault rifle is an inadequate weapon to use against a tank?
crankyhead - March 31, 2013, 1:49 pm
The crybaby who believes in an invisible man in the sky that watches him masturbate, is questioning my ability to reason, is he?
Renza - March 31, 2013, 9:17 am
I did, a**ault rifles are still useless against tanks and APCs, and the way you're suggesting they would still be viable by the rebellion in a civil war is through guerilla tactics after the main force is basically crushed.
PapaFox - March 31, 2013, 4:14 am
The basic premise being that the dweeb who thinks he's going to take on the government just because he owns an a**ault rifle and some Walmart cammo is living in a fantasy world.
ipaprime - March 30, 2013, 11:43 pm
it is a miracle cranky can think, oh but he is still unable to reason
ipaprime - March 30, 2013, 11:41 pm
please refer to your comment above for proper context
ipaprime - March 30, 2013, 11:40 pm
I simply point out that this poster is a fail on the basic premies on which it is based
Renza - March 30, 2013, 4:47 pm
so basically your entire explanation and a**umptions are based on the idea that the rebels would fall apart after being walked on by the government's military force, and would then act as small groups of terrorists just trying to randomly kill soldiers?
PapaFox - March 30, 2013, 4:04 pm
"Hostile territory?" Only Jane Fonda's house. :-D
crankyhead - March 30, 2013, 3:17 pm
IPA, are you suggesting that the JCOS consider the US to be "hostile territory"? Yeah, that's what I thought. Another illogical premise to support this rightwing nutjob fantasy.
ipaprime - March 30, 2013, 7:58 am
see explaination I just gave renza.
ipaprime - March 30, 2013, 7:57 am
so in conclusion while an ar-15 vs a tank is not good for the ar-15, in the control phase tanks would not be the target it would be the troops just like it is happening overseas right now
ipaprime - March 30, 2013, 7:54 am
also in the event of an insurrection in the states the gov would be in favor of limiting damage to the infrastructer as much as possible, so as to be able to move troops and supplies easily
ipaprime - March 30, 2013, 7:52 am
phase 2 is control in which the territory is brought under control. now if tanks and planes alone were sufficient we would be in way better shape in Iraq and Afghanistan. but alas they are not you need boots on the ground to do so
ipaprime - March 30, 2013, 7:49 am
phase 1 conquest. the taking of key targets with in said territory. prime examples, the German blitzkrieg in WW2, and Desert Storm 1
ipaprime - March 30, 2013, 7:47 am
any military op in "hostile" territory is broken in to 2 phases
PapaFox - March 29, 2013, 12:16 pm
Overseas conflicts are irrelevant in this context. And BTW you're talking to a veteran. Talk about fail...
Renza - March 29, 2013, 11:59 am
So, are you suggesting that if civil war broke out, the government wouldn't use tanks, or that the a**ault rifle would somehow be effective against said tank? or APC equivalent.
ipaprime - March 29, 2013, 10:31 am
this is a big FAIL due to your lack of understanding ofmilitay operations in "hostile" territory. please referance iraq and afghanastan to understand your mistake.

because guns are bad -

TAGS: guns bad
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JohnGalt

MashiMashi - September 3, 2016, 9:13 am
I don'tsee too many people talking about the black girl boxer who won gold twice, ....becasue of concussions,bullying, etc etc

Obamanation -

FIREARM FACT: - The 31 states that have "shall issue" laws have on average a 24% lower violent crime rate, a 19% lower murder rate and a 39% lower robbery rate than states WITHOUT.

FLAMETHROWERS - The solution to the gun control debate.